|
« The "White Privilege" Fetish Of Seattle's Public Schools |
Main
| A Polebridge State Of Mind »
The Issue Is Racialism - Not Imus; Not Rap Misogyny
April 17, 2007
In the wake of CBS's firing of shock talk jock Don Imus for calling members of the Rutgers womens' basketball team "nappy-headed hos," there have appeared a series of seemingly well intentioned op-eds, editorials and blog posts correctly noting his words of disrespect to the black women on the team pale in comparison to the sexist vitriol spewed by black rappers. Jason Whitlock wrote a widely-cited piece in the Kansas City Star. Constance L. Rice covered similar territory in the Los Angeles Times; as did S. Renee Mitchell in The Oregonian; Johnetta Rose Barras in the Washington Post; and Derrick Z. Jackson in The Boston Globe. All well and good, up to a point. But an even greater and less easily challenged affront to African-Americans is the paternalistic liberal notion that society's machinery still comprises an oppressive force negating the power of free will and the individual, dooming many black children and families to dysfunction and failure. The forces of "white oppression" are under the microscope this week in Colorado Springs at the eighth annual White Privilege Conference. What we really have here, now, is not racism or privilege. It is an instrumental racialism. That is, an enforced political orthodoxy advanced by a minority of race-hustling blacks and a larger cohort of guilty white liberals and public employee union members, which seeks to explain minority failings in education, income, crime and family cohesion in terms of "institutional racism" and "white privilege." This racialism is not merely rhetorical: it is rooted in a push for maintaining and building public employee union membership; painting modern-day American blacks as perpetual subjects of the clientized state, ministered to by variegated counsellors, intake workers, program managers, administrators and especially, "culturally competent" teachers bent on having little Arthur and Shanika rap and graffiti paint their way to a diploma. "Multiple intelligences," don'cha know? Small wonder that recently the union representing Seattle public school teachers went Code Red on the state legislature - unsuccessfully, it seems - for failing to drop state reading and writing test requirements for high school graduation because said standards allegedly doomed minority students to failure, even with four retries guaranteed under state law. In the aftermath of the predictably-played Imus affair, and the contemporaneous racialism of Seattle's school board and administrators, the real issue which emerges has little to do with Snoop Dogg or Fifty Cent and their blithely vituperative encomiums to hos in the hood. The central need is to dispel racialism, and stress black self-determination, which has a compelling history in America going back to the still-racist post-slavery decades and continuing up to and through the civil rights era, even as Great Society social welfare programs and racial quotas gradually proved the folly of double standards and low expectations. Calling out the fraud of modern-day racialism in the U.S. is precisely where the post-Imus rap critics fall short. Into this void lately have stepped a few, such as Bill Cosby and Juan Williams - and then, last weekend, Joe R. Hicks, former head of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Hick's Washington Post Sunday op-ed is simply titled, "Drop The Race Card," and should be required reading for all professing an interest in race, racism, or racialism in the U.S. today. Not so coincidentally, Hicks is Vice-President of Community Advocates, Inc., a Los Angeles-based organization with a refreshing and right-on approach to race relations. Bearing in mind Imus' flaying and the press lynching of white Duke University lacrosse players finally absolved of race-driven charges of raping a black woman, Hicks observes: ...what links both cases is the rank racial opportunism in both Imus's firing and the Duke rape case, in which the Durham County district attorney shamelessly used race in an attempt to railroad three young men for his political purposes. Remember the Michael Richards episode? In that case, America's civil rights establishment -- led, as usual, by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton -- mobilized in an effort to sell the premise that a down-on-his-luck comedian had somehow become a barometer for our nation's race relations. Hicks saliently notes prosecuting attorney Mike Nifong's re-election campaign succeeed because he played to black constituents and white "progressives" appeased by his ultimately baseless rhetoric against the white Duke suspects. In a similar though less dramatic vein, everyday white progressives in places such as Seattle regularly condone violations of the dignity of blacks by silently letting pass the loud assertions that blacks are still victims needing special dispensations from society and government. Our nation's liberal urban centers are still a long way from eschewing the cheap hustle that is racialism. But the tipping point now comes closer at a slow, steady pace. TECHNORATI TAGS: >RACE, RACIALISM, DON IMUS, SEATTLE SCHOOLS, JOE R. HICKS> Posted by Matt Rosenberg at April 17, 2007 07:08 PM Comments:
Matt, there's a lot I agree with in your post, if you can believe that. Where I disagree is that there still very much is institutionalized racism in the United States. The problem is that it stems from an issue that liberals still don't have the courage to talk about openly: the drug war. The problem right now with Democrats is that by continuing to preach about race relations, but being afraid to identify the real source, they instead find scapegoats to hang it all on who do not deserve the blame. Their attitude is "hey, we're better on race relations, so if you disagree with us, you're probably a racist". It doesn't cut it. Until the left starts talking about the drug war, the witchhunt that brought down Imus will just be as counterproductive as the effort (mainly from the right) to go after rap music. Posted by: thehim at April 19, 2007 02:56 PMIn NYC, the general feel is that IMUS got the boot because his very mainstream sponsors feared backlash from being associated with him. He can get pretty ugly, and he's more abusive to blacks than other groups. Since he's such a white idiot, too, he had no black friends to go to to guage whether what he said was inappropriate. So he went to chief race charlaton Sharpton and made him the hero. What an idiot. You make some good points, but there is a lot of stuff, especially poor black folks, are trying to work their way out of that is still due to white oppression. That is, they don't even realize they have the power to make it on their own or that the white man no longer oppresses them any more than the thug at the corner selling herb. Progress has been made, but unions still want their membership. I've been sending you quite a few e-mails the last few months. I guess I keep responding to older columns so you don't go back and read them all. Life is good. Your writing is really very good. Impressive. You'll catch on one of these days on a cable channel as a talking head, maybe during the election, and I'll see yo opposite Chris Wallace one of these days. Then, it's the Rosenberg Report with Drudge as guest host. Worst. Blog. Ever. Go drown yourself under the I-90. Posted by: Solaris at May 6, 2007 09:43 PMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |