|
« Wrigley Field's "Bud Light Bleachers" A Travesty |
Main
| News Of The Skewed, Vol. 6 »
The Price of Cowardice In Somalia
April 07, 2006
Thirteen years after the Clinton Administration pulled U.S. troops out of Somalia, the price of our political cowardice is clear. The San Francisco Chronicle reports today: Somalia is a failed state, carved into dozens of fiefdoms by competing warlords. It has no police force, no government schools or hospitals; its coastal waters teem with pirates who routinely attack passing ships. Two corners of the 1,000-mile-long country, Somaliland and Puntland, have declared themselves independent. Political security cannot even be conceived in Somalia until the pirates and warlords blocking current starvation relief efforts are neutralized. With the government an empty husk, it is necessary to approach the warlords, as a start. Which is what the U.S. has been doing. However, in this L.A. Times article, one member of the country's parliament in exile criticizes the United States for not instead working more closely with Somali office-holders. "The United States, in particular, has drawn scorn from Somalian leaders. Members of parliament complain that U.S. counter-terrorist campaigns are undermining the government's legitimacy by forging relationships with warlords to gather intelligence and pursue suspects inside Somalia. "Everyone here is talking about the double standards of America," said Mohammed Ali Shiriye, a member of parliament. "They are still giving support to the warlords in Mogadishu. But now the U.S. must respect this country. It must go through the government." But the top officials of Somalia's government (such as it is) come from a long line of thugs and kleptocrats, and have been exiled to irrelevance abroad. They are making no headway at all against the clans and warlords, as compared to the new government in Iraq, which while still bedeviled by freelance jihadists and delusional Sunni diehards, has adopted a new constitution; elected a parliament which has not fled the country; and is now trying Saddam for genocide in a trial that for all the defendant's fulsome theatrics, will engender the rule of law and fair governance. In Somalia, right now, a robust international relief effort with a stronger military component must be mounted. Then a a five-state decentralization plan - which has been discussed before - must receive serious consideration by warring factions. Against all odds, such African statesmen as exist, and the United Nations - both prodded by the U.S. - must help engineer a way out of the darkness for the truly "failed state" that is Somalia today. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at April 7, 2006 04:50 PM Comments:
This is an exceptionally informative posting on Somalia. So now we have two models of failure: Somalia, which is what we get for shirking the difficulties of occupation, and Iraq, which is what we get for using occupation an an instrument of political transformation. Which one, do you suppose, is the greater mess? That is probably not a question worth debating, since it is clear that our counter-terrorism efforts over the past 15 years stink at almost every level of execution. But we had better think of something better, and soon, because entrusting our safety to the idiots who run the Department of Homeland Security, and the fools who think we can combat bin Ladinism and the Iranian mullahocracy with arrest warrants and civilian trials, would be the ultimate foolishness. By the way, let's not count the newspapers out too soon. Your post is based on some rather impressive analytical journalism. (See also, in this regard, the fine article by Jonathan Finer in today's Washington Post, "Shiite militias seen as top danger in Iraq.") Posted by: Tom Rekdal at April 8, 2006 01:28 PMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |