|
« Dover, Delaware: Not Ready For Wiccans? |
Main
| Impulse To Censorship Reveals Islamist, Socialist Fears »
Philly Illegals Lukewarm To Work Stoppage
February 13, 2006
Philadelphia activists are urging illegal immigrants who work in the city's restaurants to skip work tomorrow on Valentine's Day to show how crucial they are to their employers, and to protest tough federal legislation targeting illegals and those who hire or help them. As this report in the Philadelphia Inquirer shows, few are likely to opt for symbolism; they'd rather keep their jobs. ...Tuesday's effort, billed as A Day Without an Immigrant, would be the first such strike by illegal immigrants anywhere in the United States, according to advocates....a "Dear Employer" form letter, prepared by organizers to help workers explain their absence on Feb. 14, was faxed to (restaurateurs) this week. It asked for...support in defeating the Border Protection, Anti-Terrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act drafted by Reps. James Sensenbrenner (R., Wis.) and Peter King (R., N.Y.) and passed by the House of Representatives in December. The Senate is to discuss immigration next month. Knight-Ridder columnist Jack Z. Smith says amnesty for many of the 11 million illegals here now is necessary, but that going forward we need tamper-proof ID for newly-hired immigrants to prove they are here legally; increased federal immigration manpower for workplace enforcement; and stiff fines for employers who hire illegals. Tony Dolz, a candidate for California State Assembly, 41st District (Santa Monica, Malibu, Topanga) argues against any guest-worker amnesty program. I am sure many "progressives" would call his views extreme, but they reflect a legitimate frustration with the double-standard which allows illegal immigrants to enter our country freely and use public resources without abiding by the most basic of our nation's laws. Dolz writes: I am a foreign born Hispanic legal immigrant who attained naturalized citizenship through the legal process. Like most Americans, I favor legal immigration and oppose illegal immigration....I believe that the immigration process must be sustainable, orderly and in observance of the law....Make no mistake; guest-worker-amnesty is a betrayal. Let's not accept a Guest Worker-Amnesty Program for the 15 to 20 million foreigners who have already violated our borders and taken advantage of the tax-payers. Let the employers who are addicted to cheap labor pay living wages and medical insurance to Americans instead. The net result will be less congestion, lower taxes, living wages for both low-skill and technical workers, higher quality of education moving at a faster pace and in less crowded classrooms, better and lower-cost healthcare for the elderly and solvent hospitals. The political reality, unpleasant as it is to some, is that amnesty is not unthinkable, as Dick Morris has pointed out. But fixing the border with Mexico has to come first. A fence hundreds of miles long doesn't faze me one bit, but alone, wouldn't be enough. Where the money for large manpower increases will come from is anyone's guess. That piece of the problem underscores the importance of federal fiscal reforms on a scale inconceivable even to Congress, now. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at February 13, 2006 05:15 PM Comments:
We are still fiddling while Rome burns on this issue. Fantasize all you want about building walls against illegal immigrants, or denying them public benefits to remove the incentives for coming. Neither has any realistic chance of happening. We are not going to adopt Soviet style tactics of exclusion (never mind the absurd costs), nor could it possibly be to our advantage to make illegals drive without insurance or leave their children uneducated. No, there is only one path to relief and that is to reduce the incentive to come in the first place. There will be no hope in this quarter so long as the Bush administraton, in its zeal for the promotion of democracy, remains blithely unconcerned about the election of one populist confiscator after another in Latin America. Posted by: Tom Rekdal at February 13, 2006 06:06 PMTom, I have to disagree. First off, a wall is not a loony idea, debatable yes. But the larger concern from which it arises is that the immigration laws of this country are not being even remotely enforced. When laws exist that we cannot summon the political will to enforce, we must either do that, or rescind or alter the law. Either of the competing bills now in play will be one thing to pass, another to enforce. As for removing the incentive for so many Mexicans and some Central and South Americans to migrate here illegally, I dunno. No matter if better leaders are chosen in such nations, and economic gains result, there's just no place like America. People are always going to be wanting to migrate here from all over the world. ....all the more reason we need a robust and well-enforced immigration policy. What needs to be fixed here is political corruption. Industry groups profit off of illegal labor, then donate to politicians who refuse to enforce our laws against illegal labor. The donations are legal, but there's no fundamental difference between that and criminals who pay cops to look the other way. Posted by: IR at February 14, 2006 11:25 AMThere is an interesting discussion of the problem of illegal immigration on the Becker-Posner Blog for Mar. 5, 2006. Both provide a good survey of the reasons why all of the possible solutions to the problem seem to be either only modestly effective or politically infeasible. Posner is slightly less worried about this only because he is not yet convinced that illegal immigration has become a net negative for the country. If you want to be impressed and depressed at the same time, this discussion will do it. Posted by: Tom Rekdal at March 6, 2006 04:12 PMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |