From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Portland Gets Nickel-And-Dimed | Main | The Pit Bull Bloodshed Must End »

Hispanic Dems Torpedo CA Gay Marriage Bill

June 03, 2005

A same-sex marriage bill, AB 19, failed in the California General Assembly yesterday, falling four votes shy of the necessary 41-vote majority. My own painstaking analysis, based on public records, shows that all seven Assembly members who ultimately sat out the vote, therefore causing its defeat, were Democrats; four Hispanics, two whites, and one black. In addition, five more Democrats (four Hispanic, one white) voted "No." The Assembly is ruled by a Democratic majority, 48 Democrats to 32 Republicans. The fissure between white Democrats and minority Democrats on gay marriage, in California and the nation, is dramatically highlighted by yesterday's vote.

Unfortunately, the San Francisco Chronicle skimmed past the real story, preferring to highlight the unsuccessful lobbying efforts of a lesbian couple.

Go here, then at "Bill Number," enter "AB 19." Click on the third item, titled "AB- 19, Leno, Gender-neutral marriage." Under Votes, click on "Assembly Floor, June 2." Then scroll down to "Absent, Abstaining, or Not Voting." Of the eight listed, all are Democrats, as you can see by matching their names against the Assembly's Democratic Caucus roster. Five are Hispanic, one is black (Jerome Horton), one clearly white (Tom Umberg), another apparently white, or perhaps mixed-race (Mike Gordon). Alberto Torrico, one of the five original Hispanic Democrat holdouts, came around to vote yes in the end, and this is not reflected on the roll call sheet.

The remaining four Hispanic Democrats (Simon Salinas, Rudy Bermudez, Ed Chavez, Gloria Negrete McLeod) did not budge, nor did fellow Democrats Horton, Umberg or Morton, sinking AB 19. While the Chron makes much of Torrico's struggle and ultimate "Yes" vote, and notes his ethnicity and religious background, they would have done their readers a far greater service by 1) acknowledging that four of the remaining seven abstaining Dems were Hispanic, and 2) interviewing some of those four, plus the one black Dem and two white Dems who also sat it out.

Newspapers should always spare no effort in understanding and clearly spelling out why elected Democrats oppose, or fail to support, same sex marriage. And why many of their constituents feel similarly. The answer is they feel it's wrong, against tradition, perhaps against their religion; that marriage should be between a man and woman; that children need a mother and a father. I understand such views can spark passionate disagreement, and so be it. But it remains disturbing that newspapers by and for urban elites tend to downplay, censor or charicature the reasons some very decent people oppose gay marriage. This journalistic bias perpetuates a fantasy world of entitlement and victimization among urban same-sex marriage advocates.

Leading to statements like this one, in the above-linked Chron piece, from AB 19's prime sponsor, Democratic Assemblyman Mark Leno of San Francisco:

"If this body can't pass AB19, it should clarify its position and say we do believe that gay and lesbian couples are second-class citizens," he said. "That is the statement that's been made tonight."

Hell, Mark...now that you've vented, talk to the House members of the California Legislative Latino Caucus, why don'tcha?

Marginalizing opponents of gay marriage as bigots is a dead strategy. It only hardens the opposition. Had any of the Hispanic Democratic legislators who withheld their support of AB 19 been approached by The Chron after yesterday's vote, and been willing to speak frankly, San Franciscans would have understood more clearly just how isolated they are, politically, and how out of tune with mainstream California. Their city's mores don't track with towns like Salinas (Simon Salinas-D), Norwalk (Rudy Bermudez-D), Chino (Gloria Negrette McLeod-D), Santa Ana (Tom Umberg-D), La Puente (Ed Chavez-D), El Segundo (Mike Gordon-D), and even parts of metro L.A., namely Inglewood (Jerome Horton-D).

In addition to the seven Democratic abstentions on AB 19, five Democrats voted "No" outright. They were Juan Arambula (Fresno), Juan Vargas, Barbara Matthews, Joe Baca Jr., and Nicole Parra.

Twelve California House Dems say a resounding "No, thanks" to gay marriage.

California already has strong domestic partner benefits for same-sex couples. With majority Democrats in the Assembly slamming the door on AB 19, perhaps it is really time for same-sex marriage advocates in California to bury this issue once and for all.

Your feelings matter less in the grand scheme of things than you think. Choices have consequences. A consequence of your choice to advocate for gay marriage is that you have energized opponents who have always existed, and you are losing. Did you really think this was not possible? Win some, lose some. Get on with life.

UPDATE: I missed two other Assembly Ds who voted "No" on AB 19, Nicole Parra, and Joe Baca, Jr. I've updated the post accordingly.

UPDATE II: Here is something pretty close to the story the Chron should have had the courage to run; it appeared in The Sacramento Bee. (Free reg. may be required).

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at June 3, 2005 12:29 PM

Comments:

Before lecturing California Democrats about AB 19 and claiming to have conducted "painstaking analysis" of the issue, perhaps you should get your facts right. Your post above refers twice to an Assemblymember "Bill Morton" and speculates that he is white, or "perhaps mixed race," but in reality there is no Bill Morton in the California Assembly. If you were thinking of Mike Gordon, who you list among Assemblymembers who "withheld their support" from AB 19, you should know that he has been absent for months due to a serious illness. Further, you list 6 Assembly Democratic members of the Latino Caucus who did not vote for the bill, but never note that most Assembly Latino Democrats (10), including Speaker Fabian Nunez, voted for AB 19. This is a complex issue that was a difficult call for many individual lawmakers. Trying to reduce it to some sort of artificial fissure along racial lines is not just an oversimplification but also a disservice to those who spent many hours wrestling with the issue and sorting out the arguments.

Posted by: Sam Delson at June 4, 2005 12:16 AM

Thanks for catching my mix-up on Mike Gordon's name. I will correct that. As to the rest, of course many Latino members of the CA General Assembly voters voted for AB 19, but it is striking that of those who specifically withheld their votes, all were Ds, and a majority of those were Latino. It is also notable that among the very few (three) Ds who voted No, two were Latino.

I agree completely that gay marriage is a complex topic, and that the Latino "angle" on AB 19's failure is not the whole story, even if I believe it is important to note. That is why I suggested the Chron should have talked to more of the Democrats who withheld support, including the white D legislators, and (D) Jerome Horton, an African-American.

As I wrote in my post:

"Newspapers should always spare no effort in understanding and clearly spelling out why elected Democrats oppose, or fail to support, same sex marriage. And why many of their constituents feel similarly."

Instead the Chron chose to play up Leno's whine in their headline, and in the story's body, the victim mentality of the lesbian couple who were lobbying for the bill. Typical. To use your phrase, that was truly "a disservice to those who spent many hours wrestling with the issue and sorting out the arguments."

Posted by: Matt Rosenberg at June 4, 2005 11:12 AM

In seeking to categorize the Democrats who did not support AB 19, geography was as much a factor as race. The roll calls listed at leginfo.ca.gov are not completely correct, because they list Torrico as not voting when in fact he switched to voting Aye. However, among the 5 Dems listed as voting "no," four are from Inland or Central Valley Districts (Arambula, Baca, Matthews and Parra) and the fifth (Vargas) is from San Diego. Not surprisingly, those from both the Bay Area and LA voted overwhelmingly for AB 19, while those from more conservative regions were less likely to vote for it.

Posted by: Sam Delson at June 4, 2005 02:03 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?