From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Israel 21C: Blog Goes Beyond The Conflict | Main | Detroit Is In Full Meltdown Mode »

Newsweek's Retraction And Misplaced Priorities

May 16, 2005

Newsweek's Retraction And Misplaced Priorities.

NBC News reports that Newsweek has retracted the May 9 story about Gitmo interrogators flushing a Koran down the toilet, going beyond today's earlier, somewhat tepid apology by Editor Mark Whitaker for possible mistakes in the brief piece, which later helped touch off deadly riots in Afghanistan that killed 15.

Tom Bevan at Real Clear Politics makes an important point about the whole thing: there is no excuse for the deaths caused by the rioters.

There's been a lot of well deserved outrage over Newsweek's semi-apology for its story alleging the desecration of a Koran at Guantanamo Bay. The details are still murky and the truth of the allegation remains in doubt. It may well be that Newsweek and its reporters delivered a terrible blow to their credibility and provided yet another example of the mainstream media rushing a poorly-sourced story to print with serious - in fact deadly - ramifications.

One thing I haven't seen, however, is any condemnation of the rioters themselves. The dismissive tone of most of the press reports I've read convey the impression that the rioting is understandable. Almost as if the alleged affront to the Koran somehow justifies the death of 15 people and the wounding of many more. As un-politically correct as it might be to say, let's stay focused on the truth: Newsweek's story did not kill people. Muslim mobs killed people.

Roger Kimball, of The New Criterion's blog, finds it disturbing people will kill over the reported desecration of a book, and wonders why the liberal MSM axis must always presume U.S. guilt when reports such as Newsweek's surface.

Nota bene: Newsweek got burned going after another "gotcha" story, alleging (incorrectly in this case, it turns out) gross insensitivity by U.S. keepers of POWs. But the greater issue by far, and the reason there are Islamic extremists being held as POWs by the U.S., is something we increasingly take for granted - Islamic extremists continue to plot and carry out a "holy war" against the "dirty kuffar," or "unbelievers" of the West.

Life is never going to be very pleasant for "holy warriors" in U.S. custody, even without their holy book being placed on toilet seats, or flushed away. "Gotcha" stories like this Newsweek piece gone wrong are fair game if properly sourced, but the "gotcha" obsession tends to obscure our nation's pressing battle against the forces of evil. Let there be no moral relativism here: We are for liberty and free enterprise; Islamic fundamentalists are for state theocracy, educational and economic stagnation, and subjugation of women.

They are evil, and we are a force for good, if certainly imperfect as a nation. The 21st Century is a better place to be today than the 8th Century. The Newsweek flap illustrates an American MSM teetering on the edge of irrelevance, not just for botching another anti-Bush Administration story, but because its priorities are so misplaced.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at May 16, 2005 04:32 PM

Comments:

I hear your argument, and I'm hearing it elsewhere (Wizbang, Powerline)... and yet I just can't quite buy it.

If you hand a loaded gun to a known crazed maniac and then said maniac kills bunches of people, you can't get away with the "I didn't pull the trigger" argument.

Maybe in court you can, but in the eyes of public opinion? No. Any journalist with enough brain cells to know how to spell his own name could've forseen how inflammatory this (fake) story would be. If anything, that warrants extra checking. To absolve Newsweak just because they didn't detonate any bombs directly is just plain wrong-headed, IMHO.

Posted by: Ponytailed Conservative at May 16, 2005 09:37 PM

I have done some initial research on the story and I didn't see any comments on the riots either. The political correctness of our time has grouped people in ways that seem hypocritical and don't make any sense to people of good sense. you could say that the Muslims are in the protected class group.. I think that it is a combination of fear and intimidation that Muslim groups pose to people that speak their convictions that disagree with them.(ie salmon rushdie) and this desire to want just get along.. but whatever the reasons I agree that.. Newsweek didn't kill those people (with intent).. But the power and responsibility of the press is clearly shown. You might say Newsweek could be charged with involuntary Muslim slaughter. Still this aggressive desire by the media to get the exclusive and be the one to break the story is getting out of hand. Those with the responsibility and power to change the way sources are used needs to change it and it needs to be across all media outlets that call themselves creditable. Should Newsweek be made an example of? It may be time…

Posted by: djones at May 17, 2005 04:59 PM

Great website.
What does the jargon term "American MSM" mean? Pls. don't write so as to leave people out in the cold who don't know the jargon.
Sorry to be critical about a trivial point.

Posted by: hlg at May 18, 2005 12:48 PM

hlg, to answer your query, "American MSM" means "American mainstream media," i.e. Newsweek, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN CBS, all the major daily newspapers, TV networks, etc.

These are in contrast with what might be called "alternative media," such as FoxNews, conservative talk radio, and especially Web logs, or "blogs."

Good point about jargon, thanks for the reminder, and do visit often!!

Posted by: Matt R. at May 18, 2005 01:34 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?