From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Spike Lee: Pimps N' Hos Gotta Go | Main | Easy Parking Is A Social Evil »

Harvard Biased Against Sexy Librarian?

March 22, 2005

That's what she claims. Assistant Librarian Desiree Goodwin says Harvard is biased against her because she's pretty. She's got 16 years professional experience, and two advanced degrees; one in Library Science, and another in English Lit. While she remains employed at Harvard, she has been turned down for 16 different better positions there since 1999.

She said she was shocked when, in late 2001, her supervisor told her she would never be promoted at Harvard. In court documents, Goodwin said her supervisor told her she was "a joke" at the university's main library, where she "was seen merely as a pretty girl who wore sexy outfits, low cut blouses, and tight pants."

Appropriate workplace attire is certainly a real-life issue, and Goodwin says she's toned it down since then. The article doesn't discuss her work evaluations, although you'd expect if they're good, her lawyers would introduce them as evidence in court.

Generally, I'm very skeptical of bias allegations.

But knowing the whole ethos of Womyn's Studies, Gender Studies, old school feminist claptrap and even the policing of "hetero-normative" speech that infects places like Hah-vahd, I'd bet that a dishy librarian (see picture in story) just might be a severe threat to some colleagues and supervisors in the university's library system.

Very attractive people sometimes have to work harder to be taken seriously in the workplace. Especially women.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at March 22, 2005 10:10 AM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/777

Comments:

If she is being discriminated against, my guess is that the discriminating is being done by angry feminists who are angry at this woman precisely because she is attractive to men and they aren't.

Posted by: Iguana at March 26, 2005 01:39 PM

Iguana, it may be a bit more something other than jealousy, altho that could figure in. The feminist ethos about women who dress in attractive clothes, wear make-up, and are noticeably sexy is that it represents a sell-out to stereotypically male-driven values, and deligitimizes the intellectual and professional recognition due to other women. Perpetuating the stereotype of a woman as a "pretty thing" whose job is to look nice, act nice, and not threaten or challenge men in any way.

In this light, the sexy librarian, by her appearance, would be seen to be helping keep women "down."

I don't agree, of course. There are plenty of Brainy Bettys (I'm, uh, married to one), recognized for their beauty and intellect. But I think the Womyn of Hah-vahd who've been keeping their pretty sister down, see it as a zero-sum game.

Posted by: Matt R. at March 26, 2005 02:24 PM

Not just "helping keep women down". She could be viewed as a threat to her higher-ups' jobs.

As a librarian, with a BA and MA in Medieval History, a BFA in music, and my MLS, I've lost two jobs in high schools because I was viewed as a threat by my bosses (and in one case this was recognized by the school admin). Dressing more dowdily might have helped (I don't dress particularly revealingly, but elegant and trendy have been used to describe my style), but the fact that I was very good at my job, and extremely well liked by both students and academic staff would have outweighed any benefits that "dressing like a librarian" might have confered.

So now I'm a solo librarian outside Academe, and no one complains at all.

Posted by: LibraryGryffon at April 8, 2005 09:12 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?