From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Anomie In Ashland | Main | Hie Thee To The Ice Hotel »

Your Friend and Mine: The ACLU

March 11, 2005

Community activists and police in crime-plagued New Orleans are pleased that public street surveillance video cameras are helping catch criminals. You always want more cops in big cities, but you don't always get them. If this helps, and it sure seems to, I'm all for it. But beware: the policy blue-noses are already playing the "Big Brother" canard.

The man marched down the street in daylight, armed with a paintball rifle that had been converted to shoot with lethal force. He then blasted a newly installed camera in hopes of freeing the drug-ridden neighborhood from police surveillance. But the shooter's image was saved on the camera's hard drive. "All it did was get him arrested," chuckled New Orleans' chief technology officer, Greg Meffert. "The camera immediately notified the police and tracked him until he was caught." And when they got him, they found he was wanted on a murder warrant.

The arrest was the first success story from a sophisticated new crime-fighting system of cameras that New Orleans is installing citywide. The bulletproof cameras can monitor an eight-block area, communicate with the authorities and provide evidence in court. Police hope the system will catch crooks in the act and serve as a crime deterrent in a city long plagued by drugs and murders.

Civil libertarians are calling it Big Brother in the Big Easy, expressing concern about an invasion of privacy and the potential for misuse by police. City officials insist there are tight controls, and they are encouraged that dozens of community groups have signed up to pay $5,000 apiece to get cameras installed on their street corners.

"Maybe the ACLU doesn't have people dealing drugs in their neighborhoods 24 hours a day," said Lisa Martin, who has a camera in her neighborhood. "We asked for a camera, we wanted it. We don't want to be afraid to go outside."

Street safety pales next to the theoretical abuses of surveillance feared by the ACLU, which sniffs that there should just be more cops on the street. Guys, guys, guys. There can NEVER be enough cops on the street in New Orleans (most especially); or most other U.S. big cities. The cameras aren't THE silver bullet; no one thing is. But they can help. Whose side are on you on? The criminals, or law-abiding residents? Um, wait. I guess we know the answer already.

Funny thing; surveillance camera footage shown on TV recently led a gas station wallet-swiper in suburban Seattle to turn himself in to police.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at March 11, 2005 01:28 PM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/764

Comments:

The trade-off between privacy and security that you endorse in this comment is one that I would accept as well. So, for me, the more interesting question is whether these cameras will have the effect of shifting certain kinds of crime away from neighborhoods that can afford the cameras and into neighborhoods that cannot.

Does this create an Equal Protection problem as well as a Fourth Amendment problem? In other words, does the city or the state have an obligation to equalize these resources, much in the way it is now argued that school resources must be equalized?

What a dilemma for the ACLU. Equality vs. Privacy.

Posted by: Tom Rekdal at March 11, 2005 03:38 PM

I love that quote by Lisa Martin. The ACLU is often completely out of touch with the communities they think they are protecting.

The concept of the ACLU is a good one. But, in practice, this particular organization has very little to do with liberty. If they did, they would be working to protect the rights of workers who don't want to pay union fees but are forced to, and they would be protecting the constitutional rights of men who have their children stripped away from them.

Posted by: DeadManVoting (aka Iguana) at March 11, 2005 10:57 PM

I pretty familiar with N.O. and some areas are pretty much a cesspool of human debris. I'm sure the cameras will work in certain areas where crime is out of control.

In principle I'm not in favor of Gov't owned cameras. Although, I would encourage any business owner and those home owners to have securiy cameras. They are getting more economical and have high quality than in the past.

Posted by: roux at March 13, 2005 07:31 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?