|
« The Oregon Panty Bandit's Darker Side |
Main
| The Foie Gras Chronicles, Part One »
SF Chron, Rolling Stone Editors: Thompson No Hero
February 27, 2005
The huzzahs for gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson on the occasion of his suicide last week are greatly misguided, writes the San Francisco Chronicle's executive foreign and national editor A.S. Ross in today's Chron opinion section. Not since the death of Princess Diana has so much worshipful ink been spilled on the occasion of a mere mortal's passing. He was a giant among men. Who cared that for years he had been a largely burned-out case, more of a circus act than a serious writer, reveling in adolescent stunts with firearms, alcohol, narcotics -- the predictable paraphernalia of the self-styled outlaw who wowed the chattering classes and other assorted rubes and poseurs long after his appeal had worn off for almost everybody else? A former managing editor of Rolling Stone, who worked closely with Thompson, John Burks, reminisces about Thompson in this SF Weekly round-up: Everybody else is partying. There sits Hunter in an easy chair, alternately gazing at the floor and into the middle distance, muttering to himself, loaded. Chuck Alverson, a buddy of mine from S.F. State and a buddy of Hunter's from their Wall Street Journal days, throws endless parties, and Hunter is a fixture. Rarely changing position or making eye contact, he tosses back drink after drink, sucks cigarette after cigarette down to the filter. Hunter is all alone. Seattle Weekly's Editor Knute Berger has a thoughtful piece on Thompson, as well. His work for Rolling Stone, writes Berger: ....was like Jack Kerouac and Ken Kesey doing nonfiction, wading into the dark heart of America—Las Vegas, the Super Bowl—and bringing back truths channeled through drug-and-alcohol-induced trances. Thompson was a poser for stoners. He became an icon for his bad habits, even as they warped and eroded his talents. In recent years, his lingering journalistic presence—a Web sports column for ESPN—had descended into self-parody. But in his prime, he was an archetype that infused many of my contemporaries. Ever a class act, Thompson killed himself while on the phone with his wife, and with his son, daughter-in-law and six-year-old grandson in the house. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at February 27, 2005 02:01 PM Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SF Chron, Rolling Stone Editors: Thompson No Hero:
» beauty and the beast from Tracked on August 23, 2005 04:16 AM
» horse sex from Tracked on August 23, 2005 04:16 AM
» beauty and the beast from Tracked on August 23, 2005 04:16 AM Comments:
Very unproffesional... I am ashamed for you and your soul, as clearly you are not. No details are necessary to justify what I say here, since you would refute them however you felt necessary. Reason is useless in the case of people like you, or, especially, an appeal to your sense of empathy. I hope your comfortable with the disrespectful and hostile things you print here. At least one of us is. Posted by: Rubin at March 28, 2005 08:31 PMfuck u, thompson was a great man and a great journalist. If i found you, i would castrate u, u filthy fucker. Posted by: Martin at May 24, 2005 06:05 PMhow easy it must be to criticize and deface the literary genius that was Dr. Hunter S. Thompson AFTER his death. It is a shame that a swine like you can use the death of the good doctor as a jumping point to futher a lousy internet blog. You could only wish to write half as eloquently and have even a fraction of the insight that the late HST had. You epitimize what Hunter hated about old journalism, and what made him truly search for the american dream. I'll say to you what the Lono would have said himself if he were still here.. rot in hell you dirty pig-fucker... Posted by: Raoul Duke at May 27, 2005 05:27 PM"Raoul Duke" ( who knows if that is really you, but I'll play along) you are right about one thing. I should have glommed onto HST's descent into clinical crappiness before his death; then you could have called me a "dirty pig-fucker" before he shot himself to death while on the phone with his wife, and with other family members in the house. Wouldn't you have enough class to not inflict that on your family so directly, if you had to kill YOURself? I hope so. See "The Sopranos" (an episode I saw on video, first season?) for instruction - a marked guy in his car down by East River, opera loud on stereo, whiskey shots, bullet, over. Wife knew it was coming but didn't have to hear the gun. Little things. Like other people. Oh, I forgot. the corporate media whores and Bush's heinous '04 victory drove him to it. Right? It kills me (as it were) that the bruised emotions of HST fans commenting here are but NOTHING compared to what his family was forced to experience, with direct involvement in his decision to blow his brains out (wife on the phone when he did it, family in the house). Beyond all that, tho, the even larger issue is: people's deaths, especially those of the famous, or once-famous, inevitably summon up reactions, judgements and evaluations of their lives and careers. No gettin' around it. Live by the pen, die by the pen, eh? What is interesting to me about the volatile, and frankly nasty, pro-HST comments on this string, is the thin-skinned nature of the reactions to criticisms of his ouvre. The spew does HST little credit. He could certainly dish it out, but I think his so-called fans greatly cheapen his legacy of no-holds-barred cultural and political critiques, by acting like Pollyannas when all the obits and remembrances aren't glowing. One reaps what one sows. Posted by: Matt R. at May 27, 2005 07:29 PMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |