From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« The Case For Partial Privatization of Social Security | Main | Transgression 101, Denver Style »

About That "Stupid" Ship Bush Sent, Franz

January 07, 2005

Blogger Varifrank works in the IT industry, and at a recent meeting with colleagues, a sniggering Euro he's calling "Franz" griped - to much supportive laughter - that Bush was "'stupid" for sending an aircraft carrier to help in recovery efforts following the massive Asian tsunami disaster.

Well, Varifrank lost it, just a bit, and we should all be glad. Here's part of what he said, as a nervous hush fell over the room:

Hmmm, let's see, what would be the ideal ship to send to a disaster, now what kind of ship would we want?

Something with its own inexhuastible power supply?

Something that can produce 900,000 gallons of fresh water a day from sea water?

Something with its own airfield? So that after producing the fresh water, it could help distribute it?

Something with 4 hospitals and lots of open space for emergency supplies?

Something with a global communications facility to make the coordination of disaster relief in the region easier?

Well "Franz", us peasants in America call that kind of ship an "Aircraft Carrier". We have 12 of them. How many do you have? Oh that's right, NONE. Lucky for you and the rest of the world, we are the kind of people who share. Even with people we don't like. In fact, if memory serves, once upon a time we peasants spent a ton of money and lives rescuing people who we had once tried to kill and who tried to kill us.

Do you know who those people were? That's right Franz, Europeans.

There is a French Aircraft carrier? Where is it? Right where it belongs! In France of course! Oh why should the French Navy dirty their uniforms helping people on the other side of the globe. How Simplesse...

The day an American has to move a European out of the way to help in some part of the world it will be a great day in the world, you sniggering little fucknob..." (Ed.-I am leaving this preceding word in, against my usual policy, as in this particular instance it is not gratuitous).

The room fell silent. My (Ed.-Hindu) friend (Ed.-and co-worker, who had lost his family in the tsunami) then said quietly to the Euros:

"Can you let your hatred of George Bush end for just one minute? There are people dying! And what are your countries doing? Amazon.com has helped more than France has. You all have a role to play in the world, why can't you see that? Thank God for the U.S. Navy, they don't have to come and help, but they are. They helped you once and you should all thank God they did. They didn't have to, and no one but them would have done so. I'm ashamed of you all..."

He left the room, shaking and in tears. The frustration of being on the other side of the globe, unable to do anything to assist and faced with people who could not set aside their asininity long enough to reach out and help was too much for him to bear. I just shook my head and left. The Euros stood speechless.

Later in the breakroom, one of the laughing Euros caught me and extended his hand in an apology. I asked him where he was from, he said "a town outside of Berlin". He is a young man, in his early 20's.

Via Baldilocks.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at January 7, 2005 09:28 AM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/646

Comments:

Well, what would have been better is add a link to tsunami relief at http://www.google.com/tsunami_relief.html

I, of course, have my own take on the aircraft carrier situation: http://josef-a-k.blogspot.com/2005/01/back-attack.html

Posted by: Josef at January 7, 2005 10:56 AM

Last I heard about France's only modern aircraft carrier it was a mess. Quote via Instapundit on 12/4/03: The new French nuclear carrier "Charles de Gaulle" has suffered from a seemingly endless string of problems. The 40,000 ton ship has cost over four billion dollars so far and is slower than the diesel powered carrier it replaced. Flaws in the "de Gaulle" have led it to using the propellers from it predecessor, the "Foch," because the ones built for "de Gaulle" never worked right. Worse, the nuclear reactor installation was done poorly, exposing the engine crew to five times the allowable annual dose of radiation. There were also problems with the design of the deck, making it impossible to operate the E-2 radar aircraft that are essential to defending the ship and controlling offensive operations. Many other key components of the ship did not work correctly, and the carrier has been under constant repair and modification. The "de Gaulle" took eleven years to build (1988-99) and was not ready for service until late 2000. It's been downhill ever since.

Posted by: Ron Hebron at January 7, 2005 06:04 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?