|
« Intolerance, Zealotry Reign At San Francisco State |
Main
| Intelligent Design: The God Cooties Won't Getcha »
San Francisco Gun Ban Would Further Isolate National Dems
December 16, 2004
The utopian visionary fruitcakes who run the City and County of San Francisco Tuesday submitted a planned Nov. '06 ballot proposal to ban handguns. Listen, I love San Francisco, and visit often, staying with friends in The Mission, and going all over town with my kids on public transportation. I've explored just about every neighborhood in the city. And I'll even share the names of some great ones usually overlooked in the paint-by-numbers write-ups. Explore Portero Hill, The Richmond, Bernal Heights, and Inner and Outer Sunset, for starters. I've walked from one end of the city to the other, met strangers, found amazing little restaurants and especially playgrounds and parks for the kids. There's no place like SF. But I'll tell you one thing. If there's one city where you should be able to exercise your right to carry an equalizer, it's this one. (Alright: LA, DC, Chicago, Detroit, Miami, Philly, Newark and NYC, too). If this makes the ballot, SF's addle-brained electorate will certainly approve it. Afterward, the measure might be overturned in court, but that's no certainty. Washington, D.C. has a gun ban in place now. If the SF measure passes, it will only further cement the perception that the city and Blue America in general are completely disconnected from reality. And THAT will damage the Democratic Party even more. Supes, here's the deal, and I don't belong to the NRA: if voters choose to "outlaw" guns, only the cops and criminals will have them. And there are never enough cops. The problem is the criminals with guns, not the guns themselves, or the law-abiding citizens who have guns for self-defense. With a gun ban, they will be easy meat for the hoodlums. That will be shameful, and will hasten the city's further decline. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at December 16, 2004 02:50 PM Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: Comments:
Methinks the Democrats may stay a minority party in the U.S. for a long, long time to come. And I'm not so sure that's a good thing. Posted by: Dean Esmay at December 17, 2004 01:02 AMI agree on both counts, Dean. As a cantankerous independent who votes for (more often) Repubicans and (sometimes) Dems, I'd like to see a far more viable Democratic Party. For instance, despite the way he abased himself before big-money Hollywood donors when added to the Gore ticket in '00, I would have listened very carefully to Joe Lieberman had his presidential candidacy advanced in '04. (Total fantasy here, I suppose) if he had gained the nomination, I might well have voted for him. Reason? Dems will hate this: he has a moral center, and was strong on terrorism. Posted by: Matt R. at December 17, 2004 09:20 AMI note that when those who advocate banning ownership of firearms are queried about who should protect individuals from violent crime, they often say "the police" should. First of all, the police is NOT legally required to protect individuals (and, in fact, can't be sued for negligence to do so by law). Secondly, let's examine this notion that the police should protect everyone. This would require a massive police presence, at every corner, block, subway station, store, apartment building and etc. In essence, in order to make this idea work, we have to turn our society into a veritable police state. I personally do not wish to live in that kind of a society. I am happy with a system where the police maintains the general sense of law and order, investigates crimes, apprehends criminals and thus serves a deterrent function. Individuals are responsible for their own personal safety, including owning and bearing of firearms for such a purpose. Posted by: James J. Na at December 17, 2004 12:08 PMThere is no man I wanted more to be President than Senator Joe Lieberman and I fully intended to go to my first caucus for him. Why? Let me use your words - "He has a moral center, and was strong on terrorism." I'm a Democrat and that's PRECISELY why I wanted him and not GWB President! Hell, Dubya was terrified of a Lieberman-led ticket! I am now and have been over the last 32 years an independent liberal (note the small "l"). I lived the first 20 of those 32 years in Canada and have lived in the US for the the last 12 (I am also a dual citizen). In those thirty years I have slowly learned that both sides of the political spectrum in the US are to some degree loose with the truth. But what I have also learned is that the left lies the most, and more importantly they lie about the core principles they preach. From January 1993 to January 1995, the Dems controlled both house of Congress and failed to enact any significant liberal legislation, particularly a National Health Care system. They let the blood-sucking vampires of the health care lobby lie with impunity during the debate over heath care reform. While they operated as a one-party state they did not place minorities in positions of repect and power (not withstanding Ron Brown - the party bagman). The Democrats lack of core values has lead me to reject them as an alternative when in the voting booth. Until the Democrats achieve real change in the way the party operates they will continue loose elections and my vote. In the mean time I will vote Republican if the candidate is a centrist or third party if they are not. Posted by: DeadWood at December 18, 2004 01:08 PMPeople, I was born and raised in San Fracisco. It was a wonderful place to live............50 years ago. Now housing is sky-high, traffic is a nightmare and an army of homeless with political friends has turned Market st., City Hall and Golden Gate park into a cesspool and drug den. Everyone hates each other for acts supposedly perpetuated by one's ancestors on one another. "Blame Whitey" is the major religion along with "Hatred of Heterosexual Men". SF? Great place to visit but not a great place to live. I moved overseas and don't miss it a bit. Claw Posted by: Claw at January 18, 2005 09:43 AMI am so angry at the democrats! When will they learn? Gun control is the issue that has cost them so dearly over the last 20 years. They are so out of touch that the republicans have been able to damage much of the worthwhile legislation the dem.'s of the past fought so hard to pass. Someday they will realize that 1). People will vote single issue when it comes to gun control and give us . . . BUSH! 2). The south will never elect a president from the norteast - southerners don't trust northerners and are tired of their condescending attitude. 3). H Clinton is not electable!!! 4). It was gun control that shot down Gore and it was being from Mass. that shot down Kerry. The Dem.'s don't deserve office due to their idiotic insistence on continuing to force an issue on the american public they clearly don't want - represent, don't dictate! Clearly the residents of SF are as far left-leaning as you can get, but they are being sold a bill of goods that has been proven false already. What's worse, however, is this is just one more example of the left cutting off its nose to spite its face. Moderates and those undecided will feel a fear in their gut because of this and it will be that much harder to get candidates elected that can help bring the US back to reality. Posted by: Michael Grace at December 19, 2005 07:44 PMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |