From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Blogus Interruptus | Main | Columbian: Dems Slime Rossi »

Lefties in Distress

September 05, 2004

Multimedia journalist Farai Chideya found Dems from Blue America enclaves such as NYC and SF to be quite glum while watching the Republican convention.

At a convention-week gathering of such types, Chideya took a decidely non-scientific poll. No one, but no one, believed Kerry can win.

"My stomach did a little flip-flop. I'd underestimated the depth of John F. Kerry's problem, his lack, to quote a phrase from the Bush I years, of the "vision thing." No one can win the presidency without mobilizing the base, and Kerry's base, uninspired and dispirited, is weakening."

Kerry's base is uninspired and dispirited because they don't even like their candidate, he is merely the anti-Bush. As I've said before, Kerry is a cipher; Bush the genuine article. Here in Mount Shasta, I had an "Aha Moment" of my own. At the Panther Meadows campground, I met one Robert Honeyman, a landscaping company employee who spends most of his spare time doing "street luge," an extreme sport growing in popularity worldwide. He straps himself on to a converted ambulance stretcher (ironic, huh?) and carefully zooms down the two lane highway on Mount Shasta into town at speeds averaging 65 mph.

And he's for Bush: telling me he was tired of Kerry's posturing over Vietnam experience, and, more to the point, wanted a "John Wayne" in charge, not an "Alan Alda."

That seems the perfect quick take of both candidates. Unlike Maureen Dowd, I'm not much swayed by Kerry's cultural literacy and Bush's less omniverous intellect. Smart is as smart does. Clinton was MENSA material, and, like Kerry, oblivious to the threat of terrorism.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at September 5, 2004 08:27 AM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/492

Comments:

The insipidity factor carries particular danger for Kerry because his slippage in the polls will tempt more and more voters who are supporting him only because he is the non-Bush to cast their protest vote for someone closer to their convictions--i.e., Nader. Why vote for someone you dislike, unless he has a chance to beat someone you dislike more? And thus the downward spiral: the lower he sinks in the polls, the more defections; and the more defections, the lower his poll numbers.

Posted by: Tom Rekdal at September 5, 2004 01:57 PM

A very plausible scenario Tom, and one I fervently hope transpires. Bush needs to win this by more than a hair's breadth.

Posted by: Matt R. at September 5, 2004 07:58 PM

Ain't that the truth, Matt...

Some conservative friends of mine here in VA have wondered why Bush spends any campaign time or money here when VA is already a solid "red" state.

To me, the answer is obvious. Bush cannot afford to just win the electoral college calculation. If Kerry wins the popular vote and loses the electoral college (as happened to Gore in 2000), the Dems will have an excuse for another four years to hamstring Bush every time he turns around.

Posted by: Jeff Brazill at September 5, 2004 08:32 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?