|
« Anti-Kerry Ads on Black Radio |
Main
| Jerry Brown's Oakland: A Work In Progress »
Berkeley Voters To Weigh In On Legalizing Prostitution In City, State
August 16, 2004
It really IS time to divide California in two; or probably, three. The swath from Santa Cruz way north up the coast to Arcata - and the patch jutting across the San Francisco Bay to Berkeley - should be joined together in the new state of Nutopia. I say this for many reasons. Such as: The Sex Workers Outreach Project has placed an advisory initiative on the November ballot in Berkeley urging the city "repeal" local laws against prostitution and "support efforts toward the statewide repeal of prostitution laws." Measure 10, also known as Angel's Initiative, stems from concerns about crimes committed against prostititutes. SWOP argues that because hookers fear prosecution for their illegal work, they are scared to come forward to police if they are victims of a crime themselves. The Measure also asserts that ".....the State of California, and the City of Berkeley face a severe financial crisis, and should not allocate precious resources for the senseless enforcement of victimless crimes." Some Berkeley residents - although unfortunately perhaps a minority - are more concerned with the social costs of prostitution in their neighborhoods, and want to see more enforcement, rather than less or none. Here's columnist Chip Johnson in today's San Francisco Chronicle. As noble an undertaking as it sounds, the prospect of unpoliced street prostitution along the San Pablo Avenue corridor...scares the socks right off West Berkeley residents already dealing with a steady wave of libido-driven street activities. Tax-paying homeowners increasingly come last in urban Blue America. This attempt to enshrine - at their expense - the streetwalker "victims" of Berkeley, is only one example. Prostitution is a stupid personal choice, undoubtedly made after a series of other stupid personal choices. Anyone who enters the trade understands the trade-offs: potentially high earnings, and uh, "flexible" working conditions; versus the possible consequences of criminal activity, plus exposure to assorted thiefs, batterers and serial killers. The Sex Workers Outreach Project is treating the symptoms of poor choices by the parents of women who got into the sex trade, and by the women themselves. If SWOP really cares about prostitutes, it should dissolve and redirect its resources toward grassroots advocacy stressing the importance of birth control, education and parenting. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at August 16, 2004 08:37 AM Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Berkeley Voters To Weigh In On Legalizing Prostitution In City, State:
» shemale anime from Tracked on August 23, 2005 02:34 AM
» young shemale gallery from Tracked on August 23, 2005 02:34 AM
» shemale cartoons from Tracked on August 23, 2005 02:34 AM Comments:
"...exposure to assorted thiefs, batterers and serial killers." Not to mention exposure to every STD known to man, or unknown, which is why prostitution is also a public health issue. Those girls standing on the corner look like walking petri dishes to me. Why in the world a man would risk his health, and his family's health, for that, is beyond me. Posted by: Laura at August 16, 2004 04:02 PMThe libertarian in me says that prostitution, while sad, should be legal. People offer sex in return for everything ranging from love to popularity to promotion (economic gain). I see no reason why they, as consenting adults, should not be able to do so for money. One caveat would be that the parties must be consenting adults and that (and this is not so libertarian) there ought be some health regulation of the participants, perhaps Nevada-style. Posted by: James J. Na at August 17, 2004 04:26 PMSo how do you think the initiative will go, Matt? It's telling that SWOP chose Berkeley, the furthest-left city in countiguous America, and used the language of victimhood so effectively that people are actually considering it. Poignant, eh? Either Berkeleyites reject the "victims" and feel guilty, or they capitulate and the place becomes several degrees scummier than it already is. The place wouldn't survive were it not for the "greedy capitalists" in the Valley. Like all socialist enclaves, they depend on the entrepreneurial success of realists and pragmatists to create the wealth that sustains their foolish waste, all while despising it. Posted by: Bleeding heart conservative at August 18, 2004 04:43 AMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |