|
« Cosby's Support Holding Firm |
Main
| No Smoking On Beach: Downtown Next? »
South African "Peacekeepers" Linked to Ongoing U.N. Sex Scandal - No Relief in DRC
July 16, 2004
New and ever-more damning reports on sexual abuse of refugees by United Nations "peacekeepers" in the Democratic Republic of Congo. And South African soliders are at the heart of it, aided and abetted by detached U. N. officials who've been aware of sexual abuse there since at least late-October, 2003. Instead of clamping down, they've allowed it to worsen. South African soldiers have been accused of involvement in a massive sex abuse scandal in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where they are on peace-keeping duties. Perhaps sometime before the next 68 complaints of sexual abuse are lodged, the U.N. will take action to prevent its "peacekeepers" from raping and sexually exploiting refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at July 16, 2004 09:37 AM Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: Comments:
Lets see............... Oil for palaces, check UN rack off on oil for food program, check Libya on the human rights committee, check Pre-liberation Iraq on the disarmament committee, check "Peacekeeping" and sexual abuse, check Asking World Court to "rule" on Israeli security fence, check. Only twisted minds on the left could believe this corrupt organization could offer the world a means to provide global security. It's a status quo organization captured by members of the worse regimes in the world. The UN is a sick joke. Shame on us. We are fools and a party to the corruption to continue to provide the bulk of the funding for these leaches. Posted by: Gary B at July 16, 2004 10:37 AMDon't forget: UN to monitor the US election, check. You know, because we only have the most open, representative form of government in the world. So it makes sense to have the body largely made up of Third World dictatorships to ensure that our elections are run fairly. Posted by: James J. Na at July 16, 2004 04:02 PMdude i think the UN is an organization with no leadership. the goal and vision is good. establishing peace and security and preventing a million deaths in 100 days (Rwanda) is good. you cant really say that the goals of UN peacekeeping is bad. they go in with no leadership and too much political clout. If there was no politics envolved then we would not see so much crap happening and maybe might see a chance for peace. and I think you paranoid UN haters only fuel the politics involved in the process and only fuels the genocide in places like Darfur. Posted by: sum guy at March 15, 2005 10:35 PMPost a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |