From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Nachos, Not Nuance | Main | Charter School Opponents Self-Destructing In New York State »

French Lawyer To Defend Saddam, Natch

March 28, 2004

Naturally, a French lawyer will be representing Saddam at his war crimes trial. The BBC reports:

Jacques Verges defended Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie, Carlos the Jackal and former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic....He will be supported by a dozen other French lawyers to mount a defence case.

...Mr Verges, now 79, was born in Thailand to a French father and a Vietnamese mother, and grew up on the French Indian Ocean island of La Reunion, where he is said to have acquired his fiercely anti-colonialist views...

In World War II, he joined General Charles de Gaulle's Free French forces, but later he became a Communist.

During the Algerian war of independence he defended Algerians accused of terrorism against France, and married one of his clients who was jailed for planting bombs in cafes in Algiers.

Later, in the 1970s, he became the champion of extremists from both left and right, defending Palestinian violence but also neo-Nazis and he leapt at the chance to expose what he saw as establishment hypocrisy at the trial of Klaus Barbie.

Just the man for the job.

Hat tip: Gary B.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at March 28, 2004 09:28 AM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/181

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference French Lawyer To Defend Saddam, Natch:


» mike in brazil from mike in brazil
Interesting.... nice [Read More]

Tracked on September 2, 2005 04:10 PM

Comments:

France sucks.

Posted by: Ben at March 28, 2004 07:35 PM

I concur with Gary.

Posted by: Naarski at March 29, 2004 01:40 PM

I meet some folks from England several years ago. They were staying in Seattle for several years, representing the British government on some project with a local company. We became good friends and talked of many things which included the French. Their disdain of the French was apparent after about five minutes of discussion.

They didn't really hate the French but rather, had no respect for these people. Well, a little loathing bubbled up.

My first reaction was oh, since I had never thought much about the French or many other countries for that matter. Other than the USA, much of the world seemed mostly another place that didn't affect my life very much. They'd leave me alone and I would leave them alone. The cold war was over and most Americans were just busy living their own lives.

I think this attitude is typical of many Americans, especially before 9/11. And this is coming from only a second generation American with a pedigree spread around Europe.

I don't know if I am much more worldy now but I pay closer attention to the world and I am choosing sides. We have to. It can be a matter of life or death. One thing I understand better now is the reaction my English friends have to the French. I will never trust the French and will never call then allies.


Ben is right.

Posted by: Gary B at March 29, 2004 07:54 PM

Gary, real thoughtful post. This part of what you said captures where I was at too, pre-9/11.

(FROM GARY B.)
"Other than the USA, much of the world seemed mostly another place that didn't affect my life very much. They'd leave me alone and I would leave them alone. The cold war was over and most Americans were just busy living their own lives.

...I don't know if I am much more worldy now but I pay closer attention to the world and I am choosing sides. We have to. It can be a matter of life or death...."

I agree, Gary. And so France (in a backward manner) proves the enduring wisdom of Teddy Roosevelt's warning: that the man who loves other countries as much as his own, likely loves other women as much as his wife (thanks Scott D!)

Come to think of it, T.R.'s line more or less describes the typical French male, non?

Unfaithful in love and international relations, The French. Or are they just..........European?

Posted by: Matt Rosenberg at March 29, 2004 09:12 PM

Interesting choice of conjunction in that piece, as noted on Biased BBC
"defending Palestinian violence but also neo-Nazis" (emphasis added). And would reflect equivalence, so would seem preferable to but, which implies, subtly, something about the non-ideological nature of Verges' client list. As if defending Palestinian violence and neo-Nazis weren't perfectly consistent.

Posted by: Alene at April 1, 2004 04:13 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?