From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Fear and Loathing in Spain | Main | Short and Sweet »

Start Smoking Today!

March 14, 2004

I'm not sure about this marketing approach.

If you don't smoke cigarettes, would you turnabout just because the price point got better? Huh?!

Yet some spam I received this afternoon was titled "Start Smoking Today," and featured a list of prices for cases of different brands.

Then a link lead-in worded (again) "Start Smoking Today!" Followed by a URL I would not post here under any circumstances, even the threat of losing my entire LP and CD collection. (That'd be a big deal!)

Back in my young and foolish days, when I did occasionally smoke cigs, my favorites were Dunhills, and gaudy numbers called Shermans - way too long, and wrapped in bright colors (fine tobacco, tho).

Smoking: truly a habit that can't be sustained. I'll add this; I have NO objection to any kind of anti-smoking laws relating to public spaces.

Any attempts to ban smoking in private homes are beyond the pale, however.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at March 14, 2004 05:16 PM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/132

Comments:

Matt, did you open up that spam? I thought we weren't EVER to open any or it would just tip them off and they'd send more.
Both of my parents smoked around me from the time I was a newborn. I had asthma almost right from the start, and have had some very severe bouts of it during my lifetime. And yes, I wish smoking were banned from homes.

Posted by: Lorna at March 14, 2004 07:26 PM

That is rotten, Lorna, and I'm sorry to hear the upshot. But how cld. govt. enforce?

Public education (nowadays, at least) can counteract fashion/peer pressure that encourages smoking. Some great, and hard-hitting anti-smoking billboard ads come to mind. There's one I just saw today off Alaskan Way Viaduct, directly targeted against smoking in homes with kids. It shows the lungs of a kid in a home w/ adult smokers, as two huge, (lung-shaped) ashtrays full of butts. The text relates just how many cigs a kid might "smoke" (in equivalent) by inhaling his parents exhaust. Powerful stuff.

Posted by: Matt Rosenberg at March 14, 2004 09:26 PM

What about all those other people who grew up with padres that smoked in the homes, but they never had problems? It is anti-American to ban smoking from private homes or businesses. Like it or not, tobacco products are "legal" meaning businesses or home owners can allow it in their pr they want. To lobby for smoking bans in private businesses and/or homes is big brother type actions. If you don’t want to be around smoking, you do not have to be around smoking. Plain and simple.

Posted by: Naarski at March 15, 2004 07:09 AM

I agree that smoking bans in private homes - or for that matter outdoors - would make no sense. As for businesses...Yes, I can just leave; but that's a form of discrimination against non-smokers who cannot bear all the smoke.

I've been there: my wife and I went into the bar of a Mexican restaurant in West Seattle for a drink and the smoke was so thick it was frankly, disgusting. We could barely breathe, and had to leave.

It seeemed not very different from being physically assaulted in some other, illegal, manner.

Posted by: Matt Rosenberg at March 15, 2004 08:51 AM

How about calling it child abuse, then, when a youngster CANNOT leave, and is made very ill by it ? Some lungs CAN tolerate smoke better than others, I suppose, but it is still a nasty, expensive habit, and ought NOT to be inflicted on anyone, especially children.

Posted by: Lorna Lou at March 15, 2004 11:09 AM

It is not discrimination to non-smokers to have smoking allowed in a private business. I could say the same for you, your dislike or distaste for smoking is discrimination against smokers and the business owner (s). I think that is a bunk argument. You knew there was smoking allowed in that Mexican restaurants before you sit down, you have the decision to eat there. You could have left, not like there is a shortage of Mexican restaurants.

Posted by: Naarski at March 15, 2004 11:12 AM

Lorna, I appreciate your compassion for the children. But, do you realize how many other dangers there are in a home that will harm a child? Do you want the government dictating what is dangerous to your child? Possibly you would like to come up with an initiative that mandate the government place a DHS rep in every home to ensure every child is enclosed in a plastic and sterile bubble? Please, that is silly, expensive and well, frankly traveling down the big brother pattern of thought.

Posted by: naarski at March 15, 2004 11:37 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?