From Seattle writer and consultant Matt Rosenberg...

« Arrests in Madrid Terrorist Bombings | Main | Start Smoking Today! »

Fear and Loathing in Spain

March 14, 2004

Prominent blogger and mystery writer Roger L. Simon heard today from a Spanish friend shortly after the socialists won in the big election. (ChannelNewsAsia report here). Their victory was fueled by voter resentment at the "price" Spain paid for backing the U.S. on Iraq; namely the horrid commuter train bombings of last week that killed 200 and are now believed linked to Islamic extremists from Morocco. Simon's correspondent said:

I am ashamed of being a Spaniard. We have just surrendered on behalf of the whole West. This is a real tragedy for all; now they know what works.

Check out the long comment string appended to the Simon link above. Here's one entry that's especially pertinent:

And now who is going to get serious about terrorism? The socialists in Spain and John Kerry?

Riiight.

Maybe they'll do what the leader in the Guardian suggested today, a
conference. That should do it.

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at March 14, 2004 02:15 PM


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rosenblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/131

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fear and Loathing in Spain:


» teen girls in thongs from
virgins pussy teenage breast teen titans hentai teen cheerleaders young teens in thongs topples teens in tho... [Read More]

Tracked on August 28, 2005 08:04 AM

Comments:

The Spanish vote complicates our own electoral politics enormously.

The risk for the Bush administration is that any criticism of the critics of our Iraq policy looks like dragging out the blanket of patriotism to smother legitimate debate and dissent.

The risk for John Kerry is that he may not be able to mobilize the anti-war wing of his party without signalling weakness to Al-Qaida. The Democratic wing of the Democratic party, as Howard Dean is fond of saying, regards our intervention in Iraq as a mistake. As Dean still maintains, Al-Qaida is now active in Iraq only because we are active in Iraq. If that is so, does it not imply that new acts of terrorism here or against our allies are merely the predicted fruit of our folly?

Is this how most Americans would view it? More importantly, is this how Al-Qaida believes we would view it? If one watches CNN's daily dose of defeatism and woe-is-me stories in its coverage of Iraq, I can see how Al-Qaida might well conclude that American public opinion may be moving against the war, and that a few bombs might be just the thing needed to topple Bush.

Yet how do we talk about these things without being accused of confusing dissent with disloyalty, or without inviting the very thing we wish to avoid?

Posted by: Tom Rekdal at March 15, 2004 08:45 AM

I think the Spanish vote may have other deadly unintended consequences. The Spanish have their own problems with terror acts perpetrated by ETA. However, past ETA tactics (based on media reports I have read over the past several days) have only focused on political and military targets. The Spanish voter's message is loud and un-misstaken, spectacular acts of bloody killing sprees work. I'm afraid for the Spanish that ETA was also listening.

Posted by: Gary B at March 15, 2004 09:30 AM

You may well be right. I do not know enough about the internal situation in Spain to assess what lessons ETA will draw from the election, or how Spaniards will react to more ETA violence. But the fact that the conservatives were more anxious to blame ETA for the bombings than Al-Qaida, may reflect a greater toughness (or at least less fear)regarding ETA.

The appeasement noises coming from all over Europe seems to indicate that the European elites are truly demoralized by the Madrid bombings. It amazes me that they cannot see that this is like pouring blood into shark-infested waters.

Posted by: Tom at March 15, 2004 10:43 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?