|
« Mad Mullahs R Us |
Main
| Of Slacker T-shirts And Mind Control »
You Can't Say That!
February 26, 2004
Writing in The Nation, no less, Todd Oppenheimer pops the bubble about school computers helping poor kids. ...most computer technology has been sold to schools--especially poor schools--on little more than hype....Most employers say their priority is what are sometimes called "soft" skills: a deep knowledge base; the ability to listen and communicate; to think critically and imaginatively; to read, write and figure; and many other capabilities that schools are increasingly neglecting. ...In reality, the schools' new technology riches have taken the real divide between rich and poor children--the educational divide--and widened it. Everyone except an awful lot of school boards. For more, check out Oppenheimer's book, "The Flickering Mind," and his site. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at February 26, 2004 08:35 AM Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: Comments:
thanks for putting this in, Matt..I went to his NATION article, emailed it to others Posted by: Lorna at February 26, 2004 11:38 AMGlad you found the piece important Lorna, and forwarded it to others. Oppenheimer deserves real credit for putting a microscope to computers in schools, and the related claims for at-risk students. Not many really want to hear what he has to say, but his research has been quite extensive, and his conclusions are - I think - very solid. Of course, a lot of it is just common sense, tested against real-life. But where does that get you these days, if you reach the "wrong" conclusion? Posted by: Matt Rosenberg at February 26, 2004 04:19 PMThis is a good point! I never thought of technology as being a burden or rather distraction in public schools. My sister teaches at an inner city school in Atlanta and would agree with the sentence "Everyone knows you need to learn to walk before you run." as these students are largely neglected at home and by their community leaders(which is a diff. topic all together).
How many nails can we possibly put in the coffin that more spending equals better outcomes in schools? Higher standards, high expectations, prodding performance, demanding students complete assignments, focusing on basics......... most seem like inexpensive intangibles that would be much more effective. Although I'm not famaliar with the specifics of the No Child Left Behind Act. I scratch my head over charges that it is under funded when it's goal is testing and accountability. Posted by: Gary B at February 27, 2004 08:08 AMI have an MS in Computer Science (Stanford '87) and I've earned my living developing software ever since. Of course, when I was in elementary school, there were no computers in classrooms. But the only useful preparation for a career in computers today is the same as it was when I was young -- a strong foundation in math and English. I'm not aware of any evidence that using computers in the classroom can add much value teaching either math or English. Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky at February 27, 2004 09:39 AMStraight from a software developer: Math, English! Post a comment
|
|
| Site design by Mystic Sludge Design© | |